A Donegal man admitted the illegal removal of dew claws from a St Bernard puppy.

At Letterkenny District Court, David Houston of Meadowfield Manor, Newtowncunningham, Co. Donegal was given the benefit of the probation act after contributing €250 to the ISPCA.

He had previously admitted offences under section 16[1][a] of the Animal Health and Welfare Act 2013 at the same court on Tuesday 7th November.

The case came to light when a St Bernard puppy was bought for €800 in June 2015. Shortly afterwards the new owner became concerned as the puppy was showing signs of discomfort.

The puppy, named “Nala”, was brought to a local veterinary practitioner who established that a botched attempt to remove her dew claws had resulted in a partial nail growth which was deformed and painful.

A surgical procedure was required to prevent future pain and suffering.

The ISPCA were alerted and Senior Inspector Kevin McGinley investigated the matter.

The court heard that he initially contacted the person who had bred and sold the puppy. They informed him that Mr Houston was the owner of the stud dog and that he had removed the dew claws of all nine St Bernard puppies in the litter when they were three days old.

The breeder said that the removal of the dew claws “was part of the service he provides when he agreed to provide the stud dog”.

The court also heard how a set of curved scissors was used to carry out the procedure in his back yard, that the puppies had not been sedated and that no training had been provided to carry out the procedure.

ISPCA Senior Inspector Kevin McGinley said “The ISPCA does not tolerate any form of animal cruelty, neglect or ill-treatment of animals and the removal of dew claws purely for cosmetic purposes is not only illegal but this sort of horrific mutilation provides absolutely no benefit to the animal. This is the first successful prosecution in the removal of dew claws under the current legislation and breeders need to be aware that performing this act of cruelty is a criminal offence under the Animal Health and Welfare Act and can have serious consequences”.



error: Content is protected